The mistress cannot be a beneficiary of the lover's life insurance.

A life insurance provider decided to take out a life insurance policy on his mistress. As it happens, he was married when he died and there was no de facto separation. Therefore, due to the prevalence of the monogamous ideals adopted in the country, which value the encouragement of fidelity as a duty of the spouses, the mistress cannot be a beneficiary, including for social security purposes.



So, in this case, the mistress could not receive the life insurance, but the son could, because he was named as the second beneficiary. Therefore, it doesn't matter whether the son is the wife's or the mistress's. He is entitled to the insurance. He is entitled to receive the insurance, as there is no legal prohibition.



Be aware and consult specialized lawyers before taking out insurance or planning your succession.